On Revision of Partially Specified Convex Probabilistic Belief Bases
نویسندگان
چکیده
We propose a method for an agent to revise its incomplete probabilistic beliefs when a new piece of propositional information is observed. In this work, an agent’s beliefs are represented by a set of probabilistic formulae – a belief base. The method involves determining a representative set of ‘boundary’ probability distributions consistent with the current belief base, revising each of these probability distributions and then translating the revised information into a new belief base. We use a version of Lewis Imaging as the revision operation. The correctness of the approach is proved. An analysis of the approach is done against six rationality postulates. The expressivity of the belief bases under consideration are rather restricted, but has some applications. We also discuss methods of belief base revision employing the notion of optimum entropy, and point out some of the benefits and difficulties in those methods. Both the boundary distribution method and the optimum entropy methods are reasonable, yet yield different results.
منابع مشابه
Revising partially ordered beliefs
This paper deals with the revision of partially ordered beliefs. It proposes a semantic representation of epistemic states by partial preorders on interpretations and a syntactic representation by partially ordered belief bases. Two revision operations, the revision stemming from the history of observations and the possibilistic revision, defined when the epistemic state is represented by a tot...
متن کاملBelief Revision in a Multi-Agent environment Recoverability vs. Priority to the Incoming Information
Since the seminal, philosophical and influential works of Gärdenfors et al. [1,2], ideas on "belief revision" have been progressively refined [10] and ameliorated toward normative, effective and quasi-computable paradigms [4-6]. Some of the main contributes have been the idea of “revision as transmutation of partial epistemic rankings” [18], “revision for finite bases” [13], the distinction bet...
متن کاملBelief Revision in Structured Probabilistic Argumentation Model and Application to Cyber Security
In real-world applications, knowledge bases consisting of all the available information for a specific domain, along with the current state of affairs, will typically contain contradictory data, coming from different sources, as well as data with varying degrees of uncertainty attached. An important aspect of the effort associated with maintaining such knowledge bases is deciding what informati...
متن کاملSays Who ? – Incorporating Source Credibility Issues into Belief Revision 1 CSE Technical Report 99 - 08
We discuss some belief revision theories and the implementation of some of them in SNeBR, the belief revision subsystem of the SNePS knowledge representation and reasoning system. The following guidelines are important to belief revision: 1. minimize information removal 2. retract less-plausible beliefs before more-plausible ones. Alterations to SNeBR that provide users with information to help...
متن کاملProbabilistic belief expansion and conditioning
The paper discusses probabilistic belief change, in particular the type of change occurring when information is added which is consistent with the old beliefs. In the AGM theory of belief revision this type of belief change is known as an expansion, and is usually considered to be easy compared to revision and contraction, the two other main types of belief changes the AGM theory distinguishes....
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016